Question

If degrees were givien in windowbsmashing,car overturning ,furniture firing, they would all have them with honours, They may still be weak in science and the arts , medicine and the law ,but they already have first in Hooliganism . Write the the context of this sentence​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Your search - If degrees are given in window smashing,car overturning ,furniture firing, they would all have ... - did not match any news results.

Suggestions:

Make sure that all words are spelled correctly.

Try different keywords.

Try more general keywords.

Try fewer keywords.

Answer 2

Explanation:

For all the divergence of opinion over the diagnosis and cure of hooliganism there was, at first, wide agreement that existing laws and court practices could not even begin to treat the illness. Observers across political lines thought that cultural conflicts had festered into serious crime problems because of the weakness of Russia’s legal structure. Beyond this point, agreement ended. There was little consensus on the issue of law reform, and most of the debates divided along political lines. Minister of Justice Shcheglovitov, Governor Bashilov of Ufa, A. I. Mosolov of the United Nobility, and the members of the Lykoshin Commission agreed that hooliganism was spreading because the laws were not strong enough to deter it.[54] Liberal jurists and observers emphasized the weakness of institutional authority and judicial practices rather than the failure of law or legal powers. As early as 1901, complaints were voiced about the lenient prosecution of hooligans. The pettiness of the offenses and the heavy caseload of the Justices of the Peace meant that many hooligans were only assessed small fines and released.[55] As Asoskov noted in Sudebnaia gazeta,

It is not surprising that cases of disturbing public peace and tranquility, assault, blasphemy, cursing, and other forms of rowdiness increase from one day to the next in our streets and courtyards. One should not be surprised by all this, because such persons, both male and female, have every reason to hope that they will go unpunished.[56]

Others on the left argued that hooliganism was encouraged primarily by the authorities’ own low regard for law and their proizvol, or arbitrary abuse of legal power. M. P. Chubinskii, a prominent jurist, wrote:

It is difficult to teach respect for the law where one finds examples of proizvol at every step and where belonging to a privileged group (such as the Union of Russian People) protects law breakers from punishment, something that for some time has occurred with the highest degree of cynicism and unabashedness.[57]

Even Blagoveshchenskii, the priest who compiled the Holy Synod survey on hooliganism, decried the government’s abuse of legality, which he called “hypocrisy” and “fertile soil for the growth of hooliganism.”[58]

The legislative draft proposal devised by the Ministry of Justice and published in 1912 did nothing to improve the government’s reputation for respecting legal norms. Fundamental to the ministry’s proposal was the concept that hooliganism was not a crime sui generis but a circumstance (ottenok) that could characterize or be associated with any crime. Since any crime might be committed with these characteristics, the proposal conceded that precise legal definition was not possible. The ministry, therefore, proposed guidelines for a definition of hooliganism to be used in establishing whether a crime had been committed “in the hooligan manner.” It would be the court’s responsibility to determine the degree to which these characteristics were present, thereby requiring harsher punishment. A crime was to be considered hooliganism if it was characterized by any one of three aggravating circumstances: