Question

If humans were concerned about biological diversity would it be best to have a low or high biodiversity for a particular environment?

Answer 1

$\huge\fcolorbox{black}{lime}(AnsweR:)$

• The abundance of living species in  the world is the name of biodiversity.  Biological conditions may be low in biodiversity (less  living organisms) or high in biodiversity (more living organisms).

• It is better to have high ID (Diversity Index)  in a given setting if people think about biological diversity.  The higher diversity index means that the environment  is more diversified and stable in terms of biodiversity.  World of greater biodiversity is more sustainable  and more environmentally friendly than environmentally neutral.  Living organisms require other living organisms to live in the  ecosystem and the greater the diversity, the more healthy they are.

Answer 2

If humans were concerned about biological diversity it would be best to have high biodiversity for a particular environment.

Why is it so?

• The wealth of living species on the planet is the name of biodiversity. Natural circumstances might be low in biodiversity (fewer living creatures) or high in biodiversity (additional living life forms).
• It is smarter to have a high ID (Diversity Index) in a given setting if individuals contemplate natural variety.
• The higher variety file implies that the climate is more differentiated and stable with regard to biodiversity.
• A universe of more noteworthy biodiversity is more maintainable and more harmless to the ecosystem than naturally unbiased.
• Living creatures require other living organic entities to live in the biological system and the more noteworthy the variety, the more solid they are.

#SPJ3