Social Sciences, asked by swastijain653, 8 months ago

if only the value of final goods and service is considered in view so in this manner secandry and tertiary sector will contribute more to gdp as they include gdp of primary sector also so why it is so​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
1

Answer:

GDP only includes final products — goods for sale, rather than intermediate goodsthat are used to make final products. So a raw steak sold to a customer at a supermarket is part of GDP, but a raw steak sold to a restaurant isn’t — only the cooked steak the restaurant sells to its customers counts. This is to avoid double-counting.

That doesn’t mean intermediate goods don’t count. It means that each intermediate step in a supply chain counts the value added at each step.

Think about a dress as an example. GDP only counts the total value of the dress that’s eventually sold. But that doesn’t mean only the contributions made by the final seller count.

Instead it means that a GDP calculation would first count the sale of the raw cotton from the farmer to the textile mill. Then it would count the value added by the textile mill when it makes the cotton into fabric — that is, it would take the value of the fabric created and subtract out the cost of the cotton. Likewise, it would count the value of the dress made by the dressmaker, subtracting out the cost of the fabric (not to mention buttons, thread, and whatever other components the dressmaker uses).

At each of these steps, labor and skill help increase the value of the dress — 4 yards of fabric are more valuable in dress form than in raw form at the fabric store, after all. The final dress is the sum of all of the dress’ parts, plus value added.

In this process, we’re single-counting all of the components, because we’re subtracting out the intermediate costs every step of the way. If we didn’t do that, we would count the cotton three times (once for each step) and the fabric twice and end up with a much higher value on the dress.

Not everybody is happy with the emphasis placed on final goods. Some people believe that intermediate production should be highlighted, and that the current system overstates the role that consumer spending plays in the economy. The Bureau of Economic Analysis in 2014 started producing a figure it calls gross output that doesn’t seek to avoid double-counting, and thus gives us more visibility into the size of different industries.

Answered by ddyadav25011980
0

if only the value of final goods and services considering we also in this manner second international sector we contribute more to GDP as they include GDP of primary sector because GDP of the primary sector is included as the primary sectors are used as raw material in producing the goods and service director sell or used in touch secondary sector and hence they are there GDP is also includes more than they did it is higher than the primary sector

Similar questions