if the demand is 100 during October 2016,200 in November 2016,300 in December 2016,400 in January 2017
Answers
Answer:
gzgjxgzdhkxmhyhkhdkhchkdkgdgchd
Answer:
Explanation:
The correct response is more than 100 per month, but demand curves are outright lies. People like Marks and Spencers accurately predicted these events for years before they lost the location.
A variation of le Chateliere's Principle is the converseis to, which is particularly applicable to financial markets. You begin with a particular stock, thoroughly analyse it, and gradually develop an algorithm that can change all the variables since you have discovered what causes it to "tick." Once you've done this well and amassed your fortune, you hire PhD professors to develop more complex models, and you've produced a sizable hedge fund with which to play.
We are currently experiencing a variation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle where Your measuring device has a significant impact on what you are measuring, or put another way, your market influence is having an impact on your market influence.
My father used to tell me that a good bookmaker (bettor) never goes out of business because he stops placing the large bets when the amounts of money coming in become unmanageable. I think that this is what happened to Bernard Madoff, who had a thorough understanding of the financial system and "could spot the winners."
Then, he became really clever and came up with a marketing pyramid scheme where the really big investment bankers were paid enormous fees to enable them to pay fees all the way down to smaller fish who were all selling an investment product to their respective customers.
peers who responded with an average of 10–12% The important thing to remember is that you don't inform anyone who hasn't been approached by a "official agent."
A covert network was established as a result, and it operated until the daily inflow of cash got unmanageable and it became simpler to send out the accurate results of the stocks, bonds, and other securities held by Madoff and Company with your money.
Prior to the banks entering the mortgage market and providing loans of greater than 100% to consumers who could not afford to service 50% loans, they pocketed the money, paid their commissions, and everyone was as content as Larry.
They made significant investments in bonds issued by the banks, as Jeremy Irons explains in the opening scene.
centred around these ridiculous loans that, on paper, appeared to be absolutely reasonable
Then, as the economy began to change, someone in Tuscaloosa or Detroit made a default, and it soon became clear that debt bonds were worthless. Naturally, all of our Madoff clients who were extremely cautious and appeared to be successful investors began to see their junk bonds deteriorate in front of their eyes.
That resulted in all of their excess Bond Incomes dropping and leaving them with no extra cash for the nice, reliable Madoff Investment bonds, which caused all of their walls to collapse.
Don't be greedy, the late Sir Alex Stone [a wealthy private banker who made and lost millions and passed away on the right side] once advised me. Profit is Sanity, or as my cousin Fred, who didn't like it, put it, turnover is vanity. Sir Alex would say, in any case Don't buy at the bottom and don't sell at the high, but always remember the golden rule. It is true if it seems too good to be true!
But let me say one more thing. There are a small number of people who will always invest at the bottom and exit at the peak.
See more:
https://brainly.in/question/47065070
#SPJ2