Question

If you have been the citizen of Kitoor what would have been your reaction towards the East

India Company​

Answer 1

Answer:

Definitely If I were a citizen of Kittur, I would be proud of my love and responsibility towards my country. Even if I had to fight a war, I would have fought, but Kittur would never bow down.

Answer 2

Answer:

When the British attempted to capture the little state of Kitoor (which is now in Karnataka), Rani Channamma took up guns and led an anti-British resistance effort. But even after she died in prison, Rayanna, a poor chowkidar from Sangoli in Kitoor, continued to oppose British policy.

Explanation:

• The Company pursued an ambitious geographical growth strategy. Under Hastings' (1813-1823) Governor Generalship, the Company instituted a new strategy of paramountcy, claiming that its authority was paramount and superior, and hence the Company's power was stronger than that of Indian states. As a result, annexing or threatening annexation of Indian states was acceptable in order to defend the Company's interests. This doctrine and its goal continued to shape subsequent British initiatives.
• Kitoor's attempt to challenge this policy was admirable. When the British attempted to capture the tiny Karnataka state of Kitoor, Rani Channamma took up guns and spearheaded an anti-British resistance effort. She was imprisoned in 1824 and died there in 1829. After Rayanna, a poor chowkidar from Sangoli in Kitoor continued to resist. He burned numerous British camps and documents with public backing. In 1830, he was apprehended and executed by the British. This is Kitoor's fight.

Reference Link

• https://brainly.in/question/8841963