History, asked by wallymherberbon27, 7 months ago

If you were Jose Rizal and was given the chance to be a guest of the Real Audencia de manila and Gov. Gen. Rafael Izquierdo, which of the two lawyers provided a better argument, Jose Montero y Vidal (a pro-Spaniard) or Dr. Trinidad Pardo de Tavera (pro-indio) and why?

Answers

Answered by ruthylalnunsangi
4

Explanation:

the first anwer is incomplete. i prefer you to look for others post, which are same as yours....

Answered by ZareenaTabassum
3

Jose Montero y Vidal and Dr. Trinidad Pardo de Tavera gave two sides of the argument. Therefore, based on humanitarian terms, Dr. Trinidad Pardo de Tavera gave a better argument.

  • The Spanish perspective of Cave mutiny 1872:  Jose Montero y Vidal, a Spanish historian documented and highlighted the events in which Indios overthrow the Spanish government in the Philippines.
  • His documentation resulted in the abolishment of privileges enjoyed by the workers of Cavite like non-payment of tributes, overthrew the secular throne, etc.
  • The Filippino perspective of Cave mutiny 1872:  Dr. Trinidad Pardo de Tavera, a scholar and researcher.
  • In his point of view, this incident was mere mutiny as it abolished the privileges of the workers of Cavite and Filippino soldiers and also prohibited the founding of school of arts and traders.

Similar questions