(ii) The person who makes mistake or commits crime should be punished
because
(a)
(b) ............
(c)
(d)
Answers
Answer:
This article identifies two mistakes commonly made about the concept of punishment. First, confusion exists about when an analysis of punishment counts as retributive, and when as justificatorily neutral. In particular, a fair number of legal scholars claim to analyze punishment in a neutral way, but closer inspection shows that many of these definitions are not justificatorily neutral. Second, legal scholars tend to analyze the concept of punishment very restrictively, with a focus on the intention of the legislator. While there may be good reasons to restrict the scope of the concept of punishment in the legal arena, from a philosophical point of view, restrictive analysis is not fruitful. It is a bad starting point for critical evaluation, because it is perfectly possible for impositions generally experienced as punitive not to be classified as such. This is all the more troublesome given that these impositions often contain fewer safeguards than are offered in criminal law and that there is sometimes a taboo on the language game related to punishment.
The person who makes a mistake or commits a crime should be punished strictly.
Explanation:
- The person who makes a mistake or commits a crime should be punished strictly.
- Because it is necessary to prevent them from committing the crimes.
- Moreover, if the criminals are not punished they may try to commit the crime again.
- In a society, the government should take strict actions to save the lives and property of the people.
- They should make the living standards comfortable and protective by punishing the wrong doers.