Question

(ii)
What is the basic difference in the arguments related to the origin of the
earth given by :
(a) Kant and Laplace
(b) Chamberlain and Moulton
​

Answer 1

Answer:     DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHAMBERLAIN AND MOULTON

The Nebular Hypothesis, as proposed by Emmanuel Kant and later revised by Laplace in 1796 considered that the planets were formed out of a cloud of material associated with a youthful sun, which was slowly rotating while, in 1900, Chamberlain and Moulton considered that a wandering star approached the sun.

                    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN KANT & NEBULAR

Kant and Laplace which is called nebular hypothesis they developed or improved the origin of solar system of naturalism.

German Philosopher Emmanuel Kant described his theory about the origin of Earth which is known as Nebular hypothesis. He thought that gas, particle are connected with each other. They have gravity attraction. By Laplace view he thought planets formed before the Sun.

Answer 2

Answer:

What is the basic difference in the arguments related to the origin of the

earth given by :

(a) Kant and Laplace

(b) Chamberlain and MMoulto

(a) Kant and Laplace

• Immanuel Kant contended that the earth was shaped from little and cold particles. Laplace reexamined this hypothesis and hypothesized nebular theory. The speculation thought about that the planets were framed out of a haze of material related with the energetic sun.

(b) Chamberlain and Moulton

• Chamberlain and Moulton looked at that as a meandering star moved toward the sun. Thus, a stogie molded expansion of material was isolated from the outside of the sun. As the passing star moved away, the material kept on rotating around the sun and it gradually consolidated into planets.