Social Sciences, asked by amazingdz09, 9 months ago

III. Answer the following in one sentence.
1. Who signed the Treaty of Madras?
2. Which part of India remained with the Portuguese till 1961?
3. Which economic theory guided the functioning of the EEIC?
4. What were the Carnatic Wars?
5. What was the main characteristic of the Dual Government in Bengal?​

Answers

Answered by mahabaig3
9
Ans1: The Treaty of Madras was a peace agreement signed on 4 April 1769 between Mysore and the British (Lord Verelst) East India Company which brought an end to the First Anglo-Mysore War. Fighting had broken out in 1767 and the forces of Hyder Ali had come close to capturing Madras at one point.
Ans2: Goa
The fight for freedom began in the 1940s as India inched closer to independence from British rule. But Goa remained a Portuguese colony until 1961, straining relations between India and Portugal as the former's support for the anti-colonial movement in Goa grew.
Ans3: Explanation: The Economy of India under Company rule describes the economy of those regions (contemporaneously British India) that fell under Company rule in India during the years 1757 to 1858.
Ans4: DescriptionThe Carnatic Wars were a series of military conflicts in the middle of the 18th century in India. The conflicts involved numerous nominally independent rulers and their vassals, struggles for succession.
Ans5: According to this system, the British had the political and economic powers but had no administrative responsibilities. They had absolute military power and the right to collect revenue in Bengal. On the other hand, the Nawab had to shoulder all the responsibilities of the administration with no real power.

Now mark me as brainliest bcz I have given your answers.
Answered by jeevika89009
17

Answer:

1. Hyder Ali

2. Goa

3. The economy of India under company rule describes the economy of those regions.

4. The carnatic wars were a series pf military conflicts in middle of the 18th century in India.

5. According to this system, The british had the political and economic powers but had no administrative responsibilities. They had absolute military power and the right to collect revenue in Bengal. On the other hand, the nawab had to shoulder all the responsibilities of the adminitrations with no real power.

This would be surely helpful to you.

Similar questions