Imagine that a meeting has been called in your area to discuss the socialist
idea of doing away with private property and introducing collective
ownership.Write the speech you would make at the meeting if you are(a)A poor
labourer working in the fields (b)A medium- level land owner(c)A house owner.
Answers
(a) A Poor Laborer Working in the Fields: Dear friends, nature has not done any partiality in offering advantages for everyone subsequently a couple of individuals having more land than others is misguided. All the advantages from our yields are the outcome of troublesome work done by people like me in planting seeds, watering the yields, keeping them freed from weeds and assembling them.
Thusly, I figure we labourers ought to participate in the advantages created utilizing the proposal of harvests, instead of getting an asset wage. To enable this, private obligation ought to be annulled and total duty regarding fields by all the labourers who are going after it introduced. Thank you.
(b) A Medium-Level Landowner: Respected friends, I don't agree that private obligation regarding should be cleared. It isn't normal and will diminish crop creation. You won't endeavour to fabricate crop creation if the whole advantage won't you.
In all honesty, what should be done is the unprejudiced dissemination of land to all, so only a couple of individuals don't have colossal packages of land, while others have to manage with little districts of land, or are precluded absolutely from claiming any land ownership. Thusly, all should be landowners so everybody benefits. Thank you.
(c) A House Owner: Friends, I figure everybody should have the basic necessities of life like food, a sheltered house and clothing, yet not to the impairment of others' property. The people who don't have land should be given the best approach to win their employments in the manner is useful. Ability to guarantee the individual property is an incredible thing for a free people.
I like having my own property that no one has the alternative to just force away from me. My neighbours may guarantee more than me, yet what is mine can't avoid being mine. We have earned our property through the real undertakings of our antecedents along these lines we should not be prevented from securing the work and knowledge of our forebears in picking up land. I think this is altogether reasonable.
HOPE IT IS HELPFUL