History, asked by ejbunsol, 1 day ago

In a compromise, both sides give up something they want in order to reach an agreement. In your opinion, why were the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 only temporary solutions to the issues between the North and the South? Why do you think these compromises failed to prevent the Civil War? State your opinion and support it with facts and evidence from the lesson.

Answers

Answered by sofianhendrik
4

Answer:

1.The exchange of Missouri as a slave state in favor of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a free Maine was just a temporary solution to the problem. Southerners believed federal regulation of slavery was unconstitutional and to impose a restriction on the institution of slavery was out of their jurisdiction

2.In particular, compromise was made impossible by 1860 due to disagreement over states' rights, intense growth in sectionalism and dispute over the morals of slavery -The debate over slavery and states' rights had become so intense by 1860 that the South was ready to break away altogether,

Explanation:

mark as brainliest my friend

Answered by 44Misty02
0

Answer:

The Compromise of 1850 contained the following provisions: (1) California was admitted to the Union as a free state; (2) the remainder of the Mexican cession was divided into the two territories of New Mexico and Utah and organized without mention of slavery; (3) the claim of Texas to a portion of New Mexico

Similar questions