Question

in a debate of vegetarian verses non vegetarian opposite team rises a question that being a non vegetarian means killing of animls how could you defend yourself .

pls help me

Answer 1

We are non vegetarian, even though if we kill animals for our food. This the cycle that has made the nature balanced. We kill animals to eat them so that we can make ourselves strong and so that we can get proteins to be active.
Vegetables are also important but we should even eat meat as it is very important for our health as well. If there will be only vegetarians then all the green vegetables will be eaten away. Thus, the animals which are "herbivores"
who only eat crops and vegetables. While the "carnivores" eat the animals. If there will be no food for "herbivores" then they will die and hence "carnivores" will starve and die too. And food chain will be disturbed fully.

You can ask a question as Being a vegetarian
how many problems do you face when you go to foreign and you don't get a variety of vegetarian food?

Answer 2

for every action there is a important reason so, early humans feed on animals for their survival however now people have set a belief that their God will get satisfaction only when a animal sacrifices it's life and also we can say in order to prevent the breakage of the food chain we undergo this process .
Hope it will help you dear !