Social Sciences, asked by nguniquenikhil2512, 5 hours ago

In a democratic government what people might do in case of unpopular laws? Criticize the laws
Hold public meetings
Write about it in newspapers and report to T.V. news channels
All of these

Answers

Answered by bansodeajit100
0

Answer:

You may be familiar with some laws such as those

that specify the age of marriage, the age at which a

person can vote, and perhaps even the laws dealing

with buying and selling of property. We now know

that the Parliament is in charge of making laws. Do

these laws apply to everyone? How do new laws come

into being? Could there be laws that are unpopular

or controversial? What should we as citizens do under

such circumstances?

Understanding Laws

2015-16

43

Understanding Laws

Q

Read the following situation and answer the questions

that follow.

A government official helps his son go into hiding because

his son has been given a ten-year jail sentence by a District

Court for a crime that he has committed.

Do you think that the government official’s actions were

right? Should his son be exempt from the law just because

his father is economically and politically powerful?

Do Laws Apply to All?

The above is a clear case of the violation of law. As you

read in Unit 1, members of the Constituent Assembly were

agreed there should be no arbitrary exercise of power in

independent India. They, therefore, instituted several

provisions in the Constitution that would establish the rule

of law. The most important of these was that all persons in

independent India are equal before the law.

The law cannot discriminate between persons on the basis

of their religion, caste or gender. What the rule of law means

is that all laws apply equally to all citizens of the country

and no one can be above the law. Neither a government

official, nor a wealthy person nor even the President of the

country is above the law. Any crime or violation of law

has a specific punishment as well as a process through which

the guilt of the person has to be established. But was it

always like this?

In ancient India, there were innumerable and often

overlapping local laws. Different communities enjoyed

different degrees of autonomy in administering these laws

Chapter 4: Understanding Laws

2015-16

Social and Political Life 44

among their own. In some cases, the punishment that two

persons received for the same crime varied depending on

their caste backgrounds, with lower castes being more

harshly penalised. This slowly began to change as this system

of law began to further evolve during the colonial period.

It is often believed that it was the British colonialists who

introduced the rule of law in India. Historians have

disputed this claim on several grounds, two of which

include: first that colonial law was arbitrary, and second

that the Indian nationalists played a prominent role in the

development of the legal sphere in British India. One

example of the arbitrariness that continued to exist as part

of British law is the Sedition Act of 1870. The idea of

sedition was very broadly understood within this Act. Any

person protesting or criticising the British government

could be arrested without due trial.

Indian nationalists began protesting and criticising this

arbitrary use of authority by the British. They also began

fighting for greater equality and wanted to change the idea

Another example of British arbitrariness was

the Rowlatt Act which allowed the British

government to imprison people without due

trial. Indian nationalists including Mahatma

Gandhi were vehement in their opposition to

the Rowlatt bills. Despite the large number of

protests, the Rowlatt Act came into effect on

10 March 1919. In Punjab, protests against

this Act continued quite actively and on April

10 two leaders of the movement, Dr Satyapal

and Dr Saifuddin Kitchlew were arrested. To

protest these arrests, a public meeting was

held on 13 April at Jallianwala Bagh in

Amritsar. General Dyer entered the park with

his troops. They closed the only exit and

without giving any warning General Dyer

ordered the troops to fire. Several hundreds of

people died in this gunfire and many more were

wounded including women and children. This

painting shows troops firing on the people

during the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.

2015-16

45

The word ‘arbitrary’ has been

used earlier in this book and

you’ve read what the word

means in the Glossary of

Chapter 1. The word ‘sedition’

has been included in the

Glossary of this chapter. Read

the Glossary descriptions of

both words and then answer

the following questions:

State one reason why you think

the Sedition Act of 1870 was

arbitrary? In what ways does

the Sedition Act of 1870

contradict the rule of law?

Domestic violence refers to the injury or harm or threat of injury or harm caused by an

adult male, usually the husband, against his wife. Injury may be caused by physically

beating up the woman or by emotionally abusing her. Abuse of the woman can also

include verbal, sexual and economic abuse. The Protection of Women from Domestic

Violence Act 2005 extends the understanding of the term ‘domestic’ to include all

women who ‘live or have lived together in a shared household’ with the male member

Similar questions