Question

In another incident involving MphasiS, India, four call centre employees gained the PIN codes, from
four of the MphasiS’s client, Citi Group, in spite of not being authorized to do so. Various accounts were
opened in Indian banks, under false names and within two months, they managed to transfer money to
these accounts from Citigroup customers accounts using their PINs and other personal information.
This cyber fraud case occurred in December 2004, but it wasn’t until April 2005 that the Indian police
were able to identify the individuals to make an arrest. It was made possible with a tip provided by a U.S.
bank when the accused tried to withdraw cash from these fake accounts. From the $426,000 that was
stolen, only $230,000 were recovered.The accused were charged under Section 43(a), unauthorized access
involved to carry transactions.
I. Name the various stakeholders of the above case study.
II. Pen down various sections under which the convicted person shall be charged for.
III. What are the facts of the case.
IV. According to you what is the common reason that a these crimes took picture in India.

Answer 1

I - Specific people or groups who have a stake in the outcome of the project are stakeholders. Normally, stakeholders are from within the company and may include internal clients, management, employees, administrators, etc.

II - This report by the Law Library of Congress provides information on ... judicial guidance in the form of principles and factors that courts must ... For many offences only the maximum punishment is prescribed and ... The level of punishment under the new trafficking of persons crime set forth in section 370.