Question

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that
Gibbons’s federal license allowed him to operate in multiple states.
Ogden’s license could not operate an interstate business.
Ogden could not compete with Gibbons in interstate commerce.
Gibbons and Ogden had to work together to operate in two states.

Answer 1

Answer:

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.[1][2] The case was argued by some of America's most admired and capable attorneys at the time. Exiled Irish patriot Thomas Addis Emmet and Thomas J. Oakley argued for Ogden, while U.S. Attorney General William Wirt and Daniel Webster argued for Gibbons.