In selection and supply categories which one is more appropriate for measuring the achievement level of elementary and secondary school student ?
Answers
Answer:
As an educator, I've taught classes of seven students, and I've taught classes of 75. In my classes of seven, I've enjoyed assessing my students through things like presentations, discussions, and debates. For these small groups it's been feasible to use supply response assessments, or assessments which require students to supply or construct their own responses and answers.
However, in my classes of 75, I've often steered away from this type of assessment. Yes, listening to student presentations is a great way to assess their mastery of content, but fitting 75 presentations into the short time we have together just isn't all that feasible. Instead, I have employed selection response assessments for my large groups, things like multiple choice test in which students select a response from provided alternatives.
In today's lesson, we'll take a look at these two assessment types and explore the benefits that come with each.
However, in my classes , I've often steered away from this type of assessment. Yes, listening
to student presentations is a great way to assess their mastery of content, but fitting 75 presentations
into the short time we have together just isn't all that feasible. Instead, I have employed selection
response assessments for my large groups, things like multiple choice test in which students select
a response from provided alternatives.
In today's lesson, we'll take a look at these two assessment types and explore the benefits that come
with each.
Let's start with the benefits of selection response assessments. As just stated, these are assessments
in which students select a response from provided alternatives. Very familiar to most of us,
multiple choice, matching, and true or false questions are all examples of selection response
assessments. They're made up of concrete questions with specific answers. They're cut and dry.
bye frnd