in six point account for the failure of developing countries like Tanzania in developing country their technological capacity
Answers
Answer:
There is the notion that the first person to figure something out has a certain claim over it can stimulate incentive for innovation, research, etc. ...
Applied within a country, this can easily make sense.
But when it is an American company/court/society saying "we figured it out first, now Africans have to pay us if they try to make it for themselves any time in the next 20-50-100 years", well, I'll leave it to you to decide whether that is just.
At present, the injustice of the matter is why it needs to be discussed. There is also the fact that fruitful relations and significant improvement in living conditions could be easily achieved, given that I don't think Americans are exactly going to be ordering African generics online even if it were legal.
What doesn't make sense to me about IP is that the person making the latest teeeny innovation is able to capitalize the sum of all human knowledge and millions of steps of innovation over thousands of years. Anyways, this is why a mere law can create such a huge financial incentive. It effectively takes all of human development and attributes the full reward to the person coming up with the latest improvement.
We have all heard the arguments in favour of IP protection enough times. When will we protect our shared legacy for the common good?
Explanation: