Question

in spite of the collectivisation programme the production did not increase immediately in 1929 to 1931 . give two reasons​

Answer 1

Answer:

ᴛʜᴇ sᴏᴠɪᴇᴛ ғɪᴠᴇ ʏᴇᴀʀ ᴘʟᴀɴs ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴇxᴘᴇɴsɪᴠᴇ. ... ᴛᴏ ᴘᴀʏ ғᴏʀ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜɪs, ᴛʜᴇ sᴏᴠɪᴇᴛ ᴜɴɪᴏɴ ɴᴇᴇᴅᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴇxᴘᴏʀᴛ ᴛᴏ ɢᴀɪɴ ғᴏʀᴇɪɢɴ ᴄᴜʀʀᴇɴᴄʏ, ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ʀᴇǫᴜɪʀᴇᴅ ᴀɢʀɪᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴀʟ ᴇxᴘᴏʀᴛs. ᴄᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴠɪᴢᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴡᴀs ᴀᴅᴠᴇʀᴛɪsᴇᴅ ᴀs ᴀ ᴡᴀʏ ᴏғ ɪɴᴄʀᴇᴀsɪɴɢ ᴀɢʀɪᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴀʟ ᴇғғɪᴄɪᴇɴᴄʏ, ᴀɴᴅ ɪᴛ ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴀʟʟʏ sᴜᴄᴄᴇᴇᴅᴇᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴀʟʟʏ ғᴀɪʟᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴛʜɪs ʀᴇsᴘᴇᴄᴛ.

Answer 2

Soviet government, pursued most intensively between 1929 and 1933, to transform traditional agriculture but it did not increase much.

• The government had tried extensively to change conventional farming practises and reduce the economic effect of the rich peasants.
• All the peasants were imposed to cultivate on collective farms and majority of the land and implements were transferred to collective farm ownership.  
• Peasants worked on the farm, and the benefit from the kolkhoz was shared. Enraged peasants defied the authorities and had their livestock burned. The number of cattle had also fallen by one-third.
• People opposing the practice were harshly punished, exiled and even deported. As they rejected collectivization, peasants claimed they were not wealthy and were not against democracy.