“In the past, many [Muslim] rulers have had the following practices regarding the training of military slaves (ghulam): after young male slaves had been bought for government service, they would be given gradual advancement in rank, according to their length of service, education, skill, and general merit. Thus, after a ghulam had been bought, he would serve on foot as an assistant to a cavalryman for one year. After that, he would be given a horse and trained to ride for three more years. By his fourth year, he would receive a quiver of arrows and a bow case and would start training to shoot and fight. With each passing year of loyal service, his rank and honors would be increased, as would his responsibilities. He would become a troop leader and, finally, when he turned 35 years of age and assuming he had served the ruler honorably in every respect, he would be appointed governor of a province or would become a minister. Unfortunately, this system has not been followed by rulers lately.”
Nizam al-Mulk, senior adviser to the sultan of the Muslim Seljuq Empire, The Book of Government, treatise composed circa 1092
Use the passage to answer all parts of the question that follows.
a) Identify ONE claim made in the passage.
b) Identify ONE way in which the passage illustrates the development of states in the Islamic world in the period before 1450.
Answers
Please make Me as Brainliest
a) The lines - ''Unfortunately, this technique has not been followed by rulers lately” depict a claim. It shows how this leaders/rulers don't follow such efficient methods to develop the skill set, and leadership qualities of a personal.
b) The lines - ''He would become a troop leader and, finally, when he turned 35 years old and assuming he had served the ruler honorably in every respect, he would be appointed governor of a province or would become a minister'' , show that the states developed within the Islamic world within the period before 1450. During those days, the rulers cared about the well being of their soldiers and folks over their own well being. that's the rationale why countries flourished and developed under those leaders. If the identical motive and agenda is followed today additionally, countries/regions would develop faster and also the world would become a more robust place to measure in.