In what ways British administration different from that of Indian ruleres?
Answers
Answer: This may help you
Explanation:
Both, Indian rulers and British administrator were were ruling their subject as per their wishes and the people did not have any say in the matter of the State.
The first major difference was that the Indian ruler normally used to inherit the power on the basis of the dynasty, while the British administrator was appointed by the democratically elected government of foreign country i.e. Great Britain.
The second main difference is that, while both the Indian ruler and British administrator used to exploit their subject, in the case of British administrator the exploited wealth will go to foreign country i.e. Great Britain, the wealth accumulated by Indian ruler used to remain in India.
Answer:
The Indian rulers had revenue and administrative divisions of their territories. But they were not very effective. Hence, the British introduced changes by making new administrative divisions which they called Presidencies. These Presidencies worked under the supervision of Governors
Explanation: