Question

in what ways the administration of Company different from that of Indian rules
please answer fast and don't spam. Otherwise that answer will be reported​

Answer 1

$</p><p>{\huge{\red{\boxed{\mathbb{\blue{\underline{\blue{A}{\red{N}{\pink{S}{\orange{W}{\red{E}{\purple{R} }}}}}}}}}}}}$

The administration of the Company was different from that of the Indian rulers in the following ways: The Company divided its administrative units called Presidencies. There were three Presidencies – Bengal, Madras and Bombay. In India, districts were the main administrative units.

Answer 2

COMPANY ADMINISTRATION

The company divided the territories into presidencies.

Governor ruled the administrative units.

Governor-General was the head of the state.

The introduction of several acts:

1.Regulating Act

2.Indian Council Acts

3.Montague-Chelmsford Reforms

INDIAN RULERS ADMINISTRATION

Indian rulers divided the territories into district, pargana, tehsil and parishad.

Zamindar or Peasants were responsible for their units.

King or Nawab was the head of the state.

ndian rulers brought no such acts but used to rule with their farmans.