History, asked by Chinkoo9771, 1 year ago

In what ways was pataliputra different from mohenjodaro? (hint: see

Answers

Answered by Human100
0

Answer:

Pataliputra: This is a large and beautiful city. It is surrounded by a massive wall. It has 570 towers and 64 gates. The houses, of two and three storeys, are built of wood and mud brick. The king's palace is also of wood, and decorated with stone carvings. It is surrounded with gardens and enclosures for keeping birds." Mohenjodaro: There was no king, hence there was no palace. The city was divided into two parts—the citadel and the surrounding area. The houses were single storeyed and made of bricks.

Answered by sandymad
0

Answer:

The main difference between Pataliputra and Mohenjodaro was buildings. Mohenjodaro: This city was founded as a well planned city with proper drainage system, grain storage area, houses were made of mortars bricks or mud bricks when excavated in Pakistan. Patliputra: It was a city capital of Ashoka empire.

Explanation:

Similar questions