Social Sciences, asked by PotterheadInsha, 10 months ago

In what ways was the administration of the company different from that of the Indian rulers ?​

Answers

Answered by Kushan2008
4

The administration of the Company was different from that of the Indian rulers in the following ways:

(i) British territories were broadly divided into administrative units called Presidencies. There were three Presidencies: Bengal, Madras and Bombay.

(ii)Each was ruled by a Governor. The supreme head of the administration was the Governor-General.

(iii)A new system of justice was established. Each district was to have two courts – a criminal court ( faujdari adalat ) and a civil court (diwani adalat). Maulvis and Hindu pandits interpreted Indian laws for the European district collectors who presided over civil courts.

(iv)The criminal courts were still under a qazi and a mufti but under the supervision of the collectors.

(v)The principal figure in an Indian district was the Collector. As the title suggests, his main job was to collect revenue and taxes and maintain law and order in his district with the help of judges, police officers and darogas.

PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST AND I WILL FOLLOW YOU

Answered by Anonymous
1

Company Administration

The company divided the territories into presidencies.

Governor ruled the administrative units.

Governor-General was the head of the state.

The introduction of several acts:

1.Regulating Act

2.Indian Council Acts

3.Montague-Chelmsford Reforms

Indian Rulers Administration

Indian rulers divided the territories into district, pargana, tehsil and parishad.

Zamindar or Peasants were responsible for their units.

King or Nawab was the head of the state.

Indian rulers brought no such acts but used to rule with their farmans..

Similar questions