In what why was the administration of the company different from that of INDIAN rulers short answer
Answers
Answer:
Under the system of 'subsidiary alliance', Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces. ... The administration of the Company was different from that of the Indian rulers in the following ways: The Company divided its administrative units called Presidencies.The conflict between the Bengal nawabs and the East India Company started when the Nawabs refused to grant the Company concessions and demanded large tributes for the Company,s right to trade. The Nawabs also denied the Company any right to mint coins, and stopped it from extending its fortifications.
The East India Company had two major objectives first to acquire exclusive rights to trade from and to India and second to somehow take over the financial resources of the country.Under the British however, India grew at 0.54% while the rest of the world sprinted at about thrice the pace with a 1.6% annual growth rate. The Mughals were invaders who came, saw, conquered, and settled.
COMPANY ADMINISTRATION
The company divided the territories into presidencies.
Governor ruled the administrative units.
Governor-General was the head of the state.
The introduction of several acts:
1.Regulating Act
2.Indian Council Acts
3.Montague-Chelmsford Reforms
INDIAN RULERS ADMINISTRATION
Indian rulers divided the territories into district, pargana, tehsil and parishad.
Zamindar or Peasants were responsible for their units.
King or Nawab was the head of the state.
ndian rulers brought no such acts but used to rule with their farmans.