Question

In which way the Nazi state establish in the preamble to the constitution

Answer 1

Hitler, after coming to power, emerged as an all powerful dictator.
He destroyed demooracy in Germany.

The First Fire decree in 1933 suspended the civic rights like freedom of speech, press and assembly and thus controlled the German population.

1. The Enabling Act was passed. It gave all powers to Hilter to Sideline Parliament and rule by decree.

2. All political parties except the Nazi Party were banned. All political opponents were imprisoned or assasinated.
3. The communists were suppressed and ‘sent to concentration camps.

4. Special security forces such as the SA, SS, SD and Gestapo were created to control and order society in ways that the Nazis wanted. 

5. These forces were given extra constitutional powers.

6. In schools children were taught to be loyal and submissive hate and worship Hitler.

7. Nazi youth organisations, the like ‘Jungvolk’ and ‘Hitler Youth’ were created where the youth were taught to worship war and Hitler hate democracy, communism and Jews.

8. Media was used carefully to win the support for Hitler and Nazism. Nazi ideas were spread through visual images films, radio, posters and catchy slogans and leaflets.

Answer 2

Answer:$<font color="blue">$Hey mate answer of your question is given below by me ...

Explanation....

Abstract

From Plato's Laws through common law and until modern legal systems, preambles to constitutions have played an important role in law and policy making. Through a qualitative analysis of the legal status of preambles in different common law and civil law countries, the article highlights a recent trend in comparative constitutional law: the growing use of preambles in constitutional adjudication and constitutional design. The article also explores the theory of preambles and their functions. It examines the legal status of the U.S. preamble and shows how the U.S. preamble remains the most neglected section in American constitutional theory. The article then presents a typology for determining the legal status of preambles: a symbolic preamble, an interpretive preamble, and a substantive preamble. While focusing on Macedonia, Israel, Australia, and the Treaty of Lisbon, the article discusses the sociological function of preambles in top-down and bottom-up constitutional designs.

I hope it can help you...