English, asked by bhaskeragarwal36, 1 year ago

INDIA HAS ALWAYS BELIEVED IN THE VALUE OF FAMILY. DISCUSS THE CHANGES, BOTH GOOD AND BAD, THAT HAVE RESULTED FROM THE BREAK-UP OF THE TRADITIONAL INDIAN JOINT FAMILY.

Answers

Answered by yashagarwal658
37

good traditional -1.special care is taken for widowed,old and weak persons
2.any ceremonies can be done easily in a joint family.
3.good discipline and good manners are taught in a joint family.  
bad traditional-1.if a child wants to go out of station for study ,he cannot go because of joint family.
2.decisions cannot be taken alone in a joint family.
3.higher earnings always insults lower  earnings.
Answered by Shaizakincsem
31

This family type comprises of at least two grown-up individuals; for the most part more distant family individuals, for example, cousins, aunties or uncles, grandparents, and grandchildren live respectively in the same home. This kind of family structure may shape because of money troubles or on the grounds that more established relatives can't enjoy themselves, alone.

The joint family system is the best particularly for kids since it assumes a pivotal role in the personality formation of kids. It applies the viable mechanism of social control and provides youngsters with an assortment of cherish able connections. It encourages us to learn relational aptitudes and the specialty of living in a society.

In the joint family we have many people around to help us and to share our distresses and delights, whom we can lean upon in a bad position.

So both of these types have their own pros and cons, but I think living together is more beneficial in the development of children and as well as for the grandparents or elderly people, they are not left alone and their children are there to take care of them or look after them.

Similar questions