India's approach towards disarmament Pol science project work full pdf
Answers
Answer:
India has had an uncomfortable relationship with nuclear weapons. From the early
days of independence, Indian leaders, especially Jawaharlal Nehru, took a very
public and very vocal stand against nuclear weapons. But Nehru, a modernist, was
also convinced that nuclear technology had a role to play in national development.1
To a lesser degree, he also thought that nuclear weapons technology might have a
role to play in national defence if efforts at nuclear disarmament should fail. These
somewhat contradictory strands are still visible today, as they have been through
much of the last six decades of Indian nuclear policy.
But it would be foolish to suggest that Nehru’s perspective on nuclear weapons
was the only determinant in Indian nuclear policy. India’s nuclear policy was
also influenced by India’s international security condition as well as by domestic
variables such as the vagaries of political change and the influence of bureaucratic
elites. Indeed, India’s decision to build a nuclear force was taken only in the late
1980s, much after it had become clear that Pakistan —with Chinese technological
assistance— had made rapid advances in the nuclear weapons programme. As for
bureaucratic influence, some defence scientists played a key role in keeping the
weapons programme alive even when there was no political support or indeed,
active opposition, while other bureaucrats were responsible for creating political
awareness of India’s declining nuclear options. Nevertheless, these variables suggest
a moderate Indian approach to nuclear weapons and thus reinforce the dominant
tendency towards a political rather a military approach to looking at nuclear
weapons. They do not suggest any dramatic changes nor rapid advance