Question

Indian constitution is a slavish imitation of the west .do you agree ? Give reasons with examples.

Answer 1

Answer:

$\mathscr\pink{Answer \: !!}</p><p>$

Indian constitution is a slavish imitation of the west. ... However calling Slavish Imitation is Illogical because framers of the constitution made necessary modifications in borrowed features to suit the Indian Conditions at the same time avoiding their faults and that too being a sovereign body.

$\mathscr\green{follow~me\: !!}</p><p>$

Answer 2

Explanation:

• No. It is not servile in any way. It also doesn't adhere to any specific model.
• You must realise that the formation of a CONSTITUTION was necessary since it is the definition of a "state."
• Naturally, a team of competent and experienced bureaucrats were given the job since they were good at drafting documents.
• They did a commendable job of creating a reference book, a manual of procedures, and definitions.
• They also succeeded in maintaining continuity by revalidating the GOI Act and appropriating the most eloquent phrases from around the globe.
• Excellent draughtsmanship and very good calligraphy instead of slavishness or imitation lead to a satisfied completion of the job.

#SPJ2