interview a person whom you consider your ideal. write down beforehand the questions you would like to ask. after talking the interview, write down both the questions and answers, in the form of a dialouge
Answers
Answered by
5
if i could interview someone I will probably choose my ideal "Albert Einstein" ' cause he was an genius and discovered so many things.
Q1) How you became so famous?
Ans- Of course, by my discoveries.
Q2) Who is you ideal?
Ans- Me, myself.
Q3) Based on your long career as a physicist, how would you define science?
Ans-Science is the attempt to make the chaotic diversity of our
sense-experience correspond to a logically uniform system of thought. In
this system, single experiences must be correlated with the theoretic
structure in such a way that the resulting coordination is unique and
convincing.
Q4) What general advice would you give a young person considering a career in science?
Ans- In striving to do scientific work, the chance — even for very gifted persons —
to achieve something of real value is very small. . . . There is only
one way out: devote most of your time to some practical work . . . that
agrees with your nature, and spend the rest of it in study. So you will
be able . . . to lead a normal and harmonious life even without the
special blessings of the Muses.
Q5)what should the attitude of the student be?
Ans-
It is not so very important for a person to learn facts. For that he
does not really need a college. He can learn them from books. The value
of an education in a liberal arts college is not learning of many facts,
but the training of the mind to think something that cannot be learned
from textbooks.
Q6) How important are examinations in the education process?
Ans- I am opposed to examinations —
they only deter from the interest in studying. No more than two exams
should be given throughout a student’s [college] career. I would hold
seminars, and if the young people are interested and listen, I would
give them a diploma.
Q7) How does science relate to art?
Ans-
After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, science and
art tend to coalesce in esthetics, plasticity, and form. The greatest
scientists are artists as well.
Q8. How would you sum up the development of Western science?
Ans-
Development of Western science is based on two great achievements: the
invention of the formal logical system (in Euclidean geometry) by the
Greek philosophers, and the discovery of the possibility to find out
causal relationships by systematic experiment.
Q9. How far have we advanced in science?
Ans. One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike — and yet it is the most precious thing we have.
Q10. What was your response on the rare occasion when one of your papers was harshly reviewed?
Ans.
I do not see any reason to follow your anonymous reviewer’s
recommendations (which incidentally are erroneous). In view of the
foregoing, I will consider having the work published elsewhere.
please Mark as brainliest.
Q1) How you became so famous?
Ans- Of course, by my discoveries.
Q2) Who is you ideal?
Ans- Me, myself.
Q3) Based on your long career as a physicist, how would you define science?
Ans-Science is the attempt to make the chaotic diversity of our
sense-experience correspond to a logically uniform system of thought. In
this system, single experiences must be correlated with the theoretic
structure in such a way that the resulting coordination is unique and
convincing.
Q4) What general advice would you give a young person considering a career in science?
Ans- In striving to do scientific work, the chance — even for very gifted persons —
to achieve something of real value is very small. . . . There is only
one way out: devote most of your time to some practical work . . . that
agrees with your nature, and spend the rest of it in study. So you will
be able . . . to lead a normal and harmonious life even without the
special blessings of the Muses.
Q5)what should the attitude of the student be?
Ans-
It is not so very important for a person to learn facts. For that he
does not really need a college. He can learn them from books. The value
of an education in a liberal arts college is not learning of many facts,
but the training of the mind to think something that cannot be learned
from textbooks.
Q6) How important are examinations in the education process?
Ans- I am opposed to examinations —
they only deter from the interest in studying. No more than two exams
should be given throughout a student’s [college] career. I would hold
seminars, and if the young people are interested and listen, I would
give them a diploma.
Q7) How does science relate to art?
Ans-
After a certain high level of technical skill is achieved, science and
art tend to coalesce in esthetics, plasticity, and form. The greatest
scientists are artists as well.
Q8. How would you sum up the development of Western science?
Ans-
Development of Western science is based on two great achievements: the
invention of the formal logical system (in Euclidean geometry) by the
Greek philosophers, and the discovery of the possibility to find out
causal relationships by systematic experiment.
Q9. How far have we advanced in science?
Ans. One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike — and yet it is the most precious thing we have.
Q10. What was your response on the rare occasion when one of your papers was harshly reviewed?
Ans.
I do not see any reason to follow your anonymous reviewer’s
recommendations (which incidentally are erroneous). In view of the
foregoing, I will consider having the work published elsewhere.
please Mark as brainliest.
Similar questions