is 'both should losers be' a paradox
Answers
Answered by
0
Parrondo's paradox, a paradox in game theory, has been described as: A combination of losing strategies becomes a winning strategy. It is named after its creator, Juan Parrondo, who discovered the paradox in 1996. A more explanatory description is:
There exist pairs of games, each with a higher probability of losing than winning, for which it is possible to construct a winning strategy by playing the games alternately.
Parrondo devised the paradox in connection with his analysis of the Brownian ratchet, a thought experiment about a machine that can purportedly extract energy from random heat motions popularized by physicist Richard Feynman. However, the paradox disappears when rigorously analyzed. More recently, problems in evolutionary biology and ecology have been modeled and explained in terms of the paradox
Hope it helps u....plz mark it as brainliset
There exist pairs of games, each with a higher probability of losing than winning, for which it is possible to construct a winning strategy by playing the games alternately.
Parrondo devised the paradox in connection with his analysis of the Brownian ratchet, a thought experiment about a machine that can purportedly extract energy from random heat motions popularized by physicist Richard Feynman. However, the paradox disappears when rigorously analyzed. More recently, problems in evolutionary biology and ecology have been modeled and explained in terms of the paradox
Hope it helps u....plz mark it as brainliset
Answered by
1
This is not a paradox because a paradox conveys two contrasting themes in a single line or phrase.
Hope the answer helps.
Hope the answer helps.
Anonymous:
Thanks for marking my ans as brainliest
Similar questions