is communism is good or bad if good or bad why give reason
Answers
Answered by
3
Communism is a utopian philosophy, so in theory it is really quite good. The ultimate goal of communism is to have a society where all resources are shared equally based on need, property is all owned collectively, there is no state, and work is done based on personal desire rather than economic need. To read Marx and Engels it is difficult to imagine a person that would not want to live in the world they describe as the end Communist state.
It seems that in reality the problem with Communism is that in order to get to the utopic end we must first pass through a time where the state has incredible authority and control (in theory this is necessary in order to set the foundation for the dissolution of private property and the state itself). So far, no state has actually acheived Marx's described communism because no government has been able or willing to give up that control and power that is required during the interloping period; subsequently, rather than having ever seen a communist society we have only witnessed socialist authoritarian regimes that pass themselves off as communist, which in practice seems to have been an undesirable state of affairs for many.
As for which form of government would have a greater impact in making a country a superpower (I presume you mean communist vs. free market democracy), it is hard to say. China styles itself as Communist but is not. The Soviet Union styled itself as Communist but was not. I would contest that based on theory alone a true communist state could not be a superpower... or any power really, as the entire goal of communism is to eliminate the need for both states and authority.
hope u got ur answer..
pls mark it as brainliest.
It seems that in reality the problem with Communism is that in order to get to the utopic end we must first pass through a time where the state has incredible authority and control (in theory this is necessary in order to set the foundation for the dissolution of private property and the state itself). So far, no state has actually acheived Marx's described communism because no government has been able or willing to give up that control and power that is required during the interloping period; subsequently, rather than having ever seen a communist society we have only witnessed socialist authoritarian regimes that pass themselves off as communist, which in practice seems to have been an undesirable state of affairs for many.
As for which form of government would have a greater impact in making a country a superpower (I presume you mean communist vs. free market democracy), it is hard to say. China styles itself as Communist but is not. The Soviet Union styled itself as Communist but was not. I would contest that based on theory alone a true communist state could not be a superpower... or any power really, as the entire goal of communism is to eliminate the need for both states and authority.
hope u got ur answer..
pls mark it as brainliest.
sweety380:
is there any communist country now
not country only... the existing Communist states in the world are in China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam. These Communist states often do not claim to have achieved socialism or communism in their countries—rather, they claim to be building and working toward the establishment of socialism in their countries.
thanks no needed... pls mark it as brainliest
what is mean by socialism
say how to mark as brainiest I will mark
Similar questions