is democracy suitable to All the Nations explain it
Answers
Answer:
Democracy is indeed suitable for all nations. Since democracy is of the people, for the people and by the people it act in a manner which is most beneficial for the people of the country. ... Not much interest is taken in the economic development of the country by them.
Explanation:
There are countries in which democracy will not work, ever. It’s because of their complex history and their view on democracy.
What comes into your mind when you hear democracy? Right to vote, USA, ‘freedom’? When you get to the USA point: is it good, or do you consider it to be bad? I for myself: I consider it bad. That is because I live in switzerland, I have a whole different way to see democracy. For me, democracy is what we have here, in switzerland, not what the US has.
Countries like russia: They do have democracy, but you can just figure out what their vote numbers tells about them. They want and need a strong leader, Putin is this strong leader. In times of the soviet union? Yes Stalin was bad, but he also was strong. Yes, some tsar was bad, but he was a strong ruler.
Countries in the middle east: They saw exactly what democracy brings. It has been tried in Iran: went out horrible. They tried it in Iraq: went out horrible. It’s not exactly because of the fake establishment of democracy, but rather it was simply a wrong democracy to them. Now, who wants this kind of democracy, where your from-american-elected man doesn’t even care to build up his country? He just lets his people die while the “freedom bringer of the US” steals their natural resources and afterwards don’t want to leave, but still doesn’t help the civilians living there in a destroyed country.
Same goes in africa and asia.
Answer:
It was believed that developing nations or under developed nations require dictatorship to foster development. But this belief has been rejected rejected because of the examples like India. Democracy is indeed suitable for all nations. Since democracy is of the people, for the people and by the people it act in a manner which is most beneficial for the people of the country. However, in case of dictatorship the dictator implements what he fells is right. Not much interest is taken in the economic development of the country by them. They are only concerned with the power and the privilege they enjoy.
Explanation: