‘Is it good to elect a president for life or is it better to hold regular elections after
every five years’? Express your view with reasons to support them, with five points
minimum.
Answers
Answer:
No, it is not good to elect a President for life. But it is certainly better to hold regular elections after a fixed tenure, which should be of five years. The reasons are given below:
(i) Rulers elected by the people can take a final decision on all the major issues.
(ii) Such elections offer a choice and fair opportunity to the people to change the current rulers.
(iii) This choice and opportunity is available to all the people on an equal basis.
(iv) The exercise of this choice leads to a government limited by basic rules of the constitutional and citizen's right.
Thus, we can say that holding regular elections after a fixed tenure ensure health government.
Answer:
I think it's better to hold regular elections than elect a president for life. By doing so we can know the actual character of the person elected over time. If there are any mistakes done by the elected person we have an option to vote after five years and change the person in power.