Sociology, asked by veddubey07VED, 1 year ago

Is it good to sacrifice animals ?
is it good to take someone's life just for taste ?

Answers

Answered by SelieVisa
2

Answer:

We cannot put all animals or birds and fowls in the same category.

It is wrong to sacrifice animals in the name of religion. It is wrong to hunt and kill wild animals and birds for sports. It is wrong to poach wild animals like elephants and rhinoceroses for their tusks and horns. It is wrong to kill wild animals and birds for their skins or feathers. Many species of wild animals, birds and fish are on the verge of extinction or already extinct.

It is wrong to mistreat pet animals. When we took the decision to keep pet animals, it is our obligation to feed them, to bathe and groom them, to provide proper medical care, and keep them happy and comfortable. By pet animals, I meant animals like cats and dogs, not wild animals and birds trapped from the wild.

Farm animals and fowls are different. They are reared specifically for food to feed the growing population of the world. They are different from other creatures. Many of them are defenseless and cannot survive if they are set free.

Answered by nehu215
5

★animal sacrifice is the ritual killing and offering of an animal usually as part of a religious ritual or to appease or maintain favour with a deity. Animal sacrifices were common throughout Europe and the Ancient Near East until the spread of Christianity in Late Antiquity, and continue in some cultures or religions today. Human sacrifice, where it existed, was always much more rare.

★The idiom, “Give someone a taste (or ‘dose’) of their own medicine,” has a long history. It derives from the fables generally attributed to Aesop, a slave and storyteller who allegedly lived in ancient Greece between 620 and 564 BCE. In this story the medicine referred to is real medicine—though, in reality, it’s actually fake. Reduced to its essentials, the fable centers on a con man who swindles the townspeople out of their money by hawking a nostrum he touts as a miracle drug that can cure anything. But when the trickster falls ill himself, folks in the village treat him with the same medicine (which hasn’t worked for them and which the trickster already knows won’t work for him either).

Similar questions