Question

Is our adversarial legal system–in which an attorney dwells just on the facts that support the side by which he or she is paid–the system likeliest to achieve justice?​

Answer 1

Answer:

Well, the adversary system is not perfect, that is for sure, but considering the cultures involved I cannot think of another system that resolves disputes and settles them fairly than the common law system developed by England and later adopted by the United States. When I mention cultures it is because the concept of “justice” can be different in different cultures. For instance, in a communist country justice might be that which most benefits the State. The legal systems in democratic countries most often are focused upon the individual. This is true even in countries with civil law systems such as France, where the law is heavily codified as opposed to the more flexible (in my opinion) common law system. However, other cultures value a type of justice that benefits the whole society.

Explanation:

Answer 2

Answer:

$\huge\star{\underline{\mathtt{\pink{Answer}}}}\huge\star$

The adversarial system or adversary system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth and pass judgment accordingly.

.

I hope this helps you........

.

plez....inbox....me......