Is religion in politics dangerous ? ( grade 10 ncert cbse civics )
Answers
Answer:
yes religion in politics is dangerous because many parties helps those people which follows same religion if their and they gets more benifit by parties which can lead to a huge conflict.
hope it helps.....
Answer:
Introduction
It is well-established scientifically that certain chemicals should not be mixed. For example, vinegar and bleach should not even be stored in the same place. Like the rules of chemistry, politics, and religion create their version of danger. The more you mix either one into the other, the results get even more lethal. Neither religion mixed with politics nor politics with religion do good to either its believers or partisans. Faith is the most powerful thing in the world, especially for those who believe the idea of a Creator of the universe. In this context, organized religion’s uniting power is more significant than any other ideologies including nationalism. It attracts millions primarily for two main reasons: not only it fulfills the sense of the need to believe, but also it gives hope to faithful a chance to achieve living an eternal life by creating a cause for believers beyond this life. In a way, religion is like a vitamin for the human spiritual experience. With faith, the materialistic side of the humanity matches with its equal and provides an everlasting satisfaction to humankind to believe in something more powerful than them. In most cases, people return to their religious roots to escape the complexity of modern life.
Religion also introduces the humanity the concept of God, who is the Supreme Being also known as Yahweh, Lord, and Allah. The Creator of All does not like competition and declares itself as the only truth. Indeed, the divine authority of the God on earth has been the subject of humanity’s ideological evolution. The issue of God’s Sovereignty has been a significant theme for many believers.
“The relation between religion and politics continues to be an important theme in political philosophy.”
Sadly, history recorded many of human tragedies, wars, and persecutions which involved cases for people being choosing the ‘wrong God.’ Therefore, throughout history disagreements among believers not only stirred conflicts between them but also created factions within them.
The original idea behind the politics was to achieve the “ideal state and the society.” The Greek Philosophers Aristotle and Plato always envisioned the politics in that real sense. The government must be a servant not a bull in the china shop. Policies must aim to create a better society than the existing one. Unfortunately, today politics is all about power and less about religion. Political parties want to dominate their spheres. In this context, faith provides bigger, broader and the most cost-effective shield than any other instrument of alliances to those ambitious Machiavellist minded politicians who can get rid of their rivals. This article examines the abusive relationship between religion and the politics in the Islamic context.
Definitional Issues
Guilain Denoeux, a professor of government, defines the Political Islam as
“a form of instrumentalization of Islam by individuals, groups, and organizations that pursue political objectives.”
In this context, the values and principles for an ideal society must be borrowed from the Islamic traditions. Another definition focuses more on the territorial aspects of the Islam and the Muslims worldwide. It
“describes a transnational social movement that seeks to mobilize Muslims into political activities.”
Unlike moderate Muslims, the Islamists do not believe in the change of religion. Among them, there is a range of loyalism to the strict interpretation of the Qur’an and Islamic law in the modern world. Some hard-core Islamists consider violence and terror tactics to achieve their objectives whereas others heavily rely on seizing the political power through non-violence. They only view the solution in the political power and aims to seize it with all branches. They would
“make instrumental use of the ballot box to capture the state, only to subsequently dismantle democracy.”
Frankly, religion becomes an instrument to gain more powers. They start to embed their doctrines of the Islamist ideology as the single political ideology of the state. More particularly, the public education system became a source for their political machine. Eventually, the following dangerous mix would give birth to politically motivated and spiritually vacated group of people who are in love with their executioners. In an ideological atmosphere, pluralism erodes, and dissenters’ loyalty questioned for their religion , Islam can be compatible with democracy, but Islamism cannot. In the world of Islam, Islamism aims at reversing the process of cultural modernization.”