It is always preferable to prevent the occurence of disaster rather than mitigating (reducing) the impacts of disaster.make a comment in this statement. write it in simple words. plz its urgent.
those who give answer in simple words I will mark it as brainliest.
Answers
Answered by
0
if the disaters are prevnted there will be no loss of life and property but reducing the impacts will have some effects
pragya595:
answer it in 100 words then only I will mark it as brainliest and follow u .plz plz
plz plz
Answered by
0
because, prevention is better can cure.
we can't have technology to protect from disaster, but we have ability to reduce the chance of disaster, because human activities are responsible for disaster, we can get rid from, disaster by not harming environment
we can't have technology to protect from disaster, but we have ability to reduce the chance of disaster, because human activities are responsible for disaster, we can get rid from, disaster by not harming environment
plz answer it some more. plz plz
plz some more
its very urgent plz
i gave an answer also
you can give answer in this comment and thanks box plz
Similar questions