Jeremy wrote an essay supporting having pizza in the cafeteria. Then he found information showing that some types of pizza are unhealthy.
His first essay stated, "Our school should serve pizza in the cafeteria every day. Pizza is delicious, and kids love to eat it. Right now, many students do not finish their lunches because they do not like the food that is served. They throw their lunches away, which is wasteful. Pizza is a good food that kids will eat.”
His second essay states, "Our school should offer pizza for lunch every day. This will keep students from having to buy food they do not like and then throwing it away. Some kinds of pizza are unhealthy, but the school could offer healthy toppings such as fresh veggies.”
Which statement best describes the difference between Jeremy’s first and second essays?
He argued that the conflicting information was unreliable.
He revised the claim to agree with the conflicting source.
He proved that the conflicting information was not important.
He adjusted his argument in response to the conflicting information.
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
The first claim states that kids love pizza, so they should give it every day. The second claim that the pizza needs to be healthy because the kids' health is important.
Explanation:
Similar questions