Question

Justin claims that Newton’s First Law of Motion explains why the hockey puck changes
direction every time it hits a bumper. Which of the following statements best justifies
Justin’s claim about the scenario above?
A. The hockey puck stopped traveling in a straight line and changed directions
because the bumpers applied an unbalanced force onto the hockey puck.
B. The hockey puck stopped traveling in a constant velocity and came to rest
because the bumpers applied an unbalanced force onto the hockey puck.
C. The hockey puck continued to travel in a straight line at a constant
velocity because it did not experience an unbalanced force.
D. The hockey puck continued to travel in straight lines at a constant velocity even
after experiencing an unbalanced force.

Answer 1

Answer:

option a is correct

Explanation:

mark me as brainlist follow me please