Question

kannaiah, Ramya and Samoa have a debate.ramya argues it is okay to restrict the freedom of press etc but ensure that people don't live in poverty.salma argues that food alone is not important.this equally important to have freedom of press because there is no other way people would know if there is violation of dignity of people in different parts of the country.kannayya says that how will it make a difference if press belongs to the rich and powerful people,why would they cover things that ordinary people expect.they have different expectations . whom would you agree with and give reasons, from the context of human rights?​

Answer 1

Answer:

kannaiah, Ramya and Samoa have a debate.ramya argues it is okay to ...

5 days ago · Kannaiah, Ramya and Samoa have a debate.ramya argues it is okay to restrict the freedom of press etc but ensure .