Question

Kerala with lower per capita has a better Human Development ranking than Punjab hence per capita income is not a useful Criterion at all and should not be used to compare all and should not be used to compare States do you agree discuss​

Answer 1

Answer:

yes i agree

Explanation:

but per capita income is given by World bank to compare different countries or states wether it is developed or underdeveloping...

and other than per capita income ..like infant morality rate, literary rate,net attendance ratio,gross national income,life expectancy at birth HDI. and many other also use to compare different countries or states.

Answer 2

No, I do not agree with the statement that per capita income is not a useful criterion at all. Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra because, human development ranking is determined using a combination of factors such as health, education, and income. So, this does not imply that per capita income is not useful. Rather, per capita income is one of the development factors and can not be neglected. The World Bank uses per capita income as the criterion for measuring development and comparing states. But this criterion has certain limitations because of which determination of Human Development Index (HDI) is done using this criterion along with some other development factors like health, education etc. If the rate of population growth, is higher than the rate of growth of national income, this will lead to fall in per capita availability of goods and services and economic welfare.