kerala with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than maharashtra. hence , per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states . do you agree ? discuss
Answers
Answered by
5
Answer:
Hey mate here is ur answer...
Kerela with low per capita income has a better human development ranking as it has made investment in education and IMR. While haryana hasn't done so...
PLS MARK ME THE BRAINLIEST IF U LIKE THE ANSWER...
Answered by
16
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
kerala has invested more money on increasing literacy rate and decreasing IMR.Maharashtra has the higher undernourished people compared to the country.therefore per capita income is not a useful criterion to compare .
Similar questions