Kerala with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than maharashtra and per capita income is not a useful criteria at all and should not be used to compare states do you agree discuss
Answers
Kerela with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra because Kerela focused more on providing basic facilities to its citizens.
However,it would be wrong to say that,per capita income is not a useful criterion.
Per capita income tells us about the average income of the states.
Even,though per capita income has its limitations,but it cannot be neglected from being taken as criterion to compare states.
Per capita along with other criterions like literacy rate,infant mortality rate and net attendence ratio can be used to measure the development of different states.
Hope it helps u!!!
No, I do not agree with the statement that per capita income is not a useful criterion at all. Kerala, with lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra because, human development ranking is determined using a combination of factors such as health, education, and income. So, this does not imply that per capita income is not useful. Rather, per capita income is one of the development factors and can not be neglected. The World Bank uses per capita income as the criterion for measuring development and comparing states. But this criterion has certain limitations because of which determination of Human Development Index (HDI) is done using this criterion along with some other development factors like health, education etc. If the rate of population growth, is higher than the rate of growth of national income, this will lead to fall in per capita availability of goods and services and economic welfare.