Question

Kerela with lower per capita income has a better human devlopment ranking than haryana. hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. do you agree? Discuss​

Answer 1

Kerala, with lower per capita income, has a better human development ranking than Haryana. Hence, per capita income is not a useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states. This is true because the literacy rate, infant mortality rate, healthcare facilities, etc are better in Kerala in comparison to Haryana. The per capita income is only calculated by calculating the average income of the state, irrespective of any other factor.

Answer 2

Answer:

please mark me as brainliest

Explanation:

for example comparing punjab with kerala

Punjab is the most developed state in India ( 2003-03 ) on per capita income basis.

The per capita income of Punjab in 2002-2003 is Rs. 26,000 per annum.

Kerala has low per capita income as compared to Punjab.

But Kerala has HDI rank better than Punjab.

Kerala is having holistic Human Development in terms of education, health, income. Per capita income is vital but not the sole factor in development perspective.