Social Sciences, asked by abhirajpatelabhiraj, 1 month ago

Kerela with the lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra hence per capita income is not useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states​

Answers

Answered by Ashmithajayanthilal
2

Explanation:

Kerela with the lower per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra hence per capita income is not useful criterion at all and should not be used to compare states

Answered by Anantsharma01
1

Answer:

No, I do not agree with the statement that per capita income is not a useful criterion at all. Kerala, with low per capita income has a better human development ranking than Maharashtra because human development ranking is determined using a combination of factors such as health, education and income.

Similar questions