Question

Learning Exercises / Activities
Discussion-Questions
1. Before reading this presentation, how would you have defined an argument?
Differentiate between your earlier definition of an argument and the one that
emerges from this article.
2. Develop an argumentative paragraph (either pro or con) on the subject, "Should
Students Be Responsible for Their Learning?" in a separate paragraph, explain why
you chose the particular evidence you did What would be the primary objection that
someone taking an opposition position to you might make, and why? Be specific.
3. With respect to the sociaal conventions implicit to argumentation - bilaterality, self-
risk, fairness, and rationlity - apply these to yourself in a self-examination of the
way you have attempted argumentation and argumentative writing prior to now.
What do you learn from this self-assessment?​

Answer 1

Answer:

chapter name or any information?

Answer 2

Answer:

The "developing an argument" as persuading the reader and using logic to reach a conclusion.

Explanation:

1. Before reading this presentation, how would you have defined an argument?

Differentiate between your earlier definition of an argument and the one that emerges from this article.

One of the major modes of discourse, argumentation can be applied to virtually all assignments involving critical reasoning no matter the subject or discipline. As it involves a higher level of reasoning than associated with descriptive writing, or narrative writing, or expository writing per se, it is crucial for the successful university-level student to understand and master the principles, indeed the concepts that drive the critical thinking skills associated with argumentative writing.

The argumentative essay shares many characteristics with the expository essay. The argument also consists of an introduction, body and conclusion. It also is built around a major premise (in this instance, called the Proposition rather than the Thesis Statement). Additionally, there is a definite pattern of organization used in developing the argument. But before delving more deeply into this, let us go to the fundamentals.

2. Develop an argumentative paragraph (either pro or con) on the subject, "Should Students Be Responsible for Their Learning?"

In a separate paragraph, explain why you chose the particular evidence you did What would be the primary objection that someone taking an opposition position to you might make, and why?

Be specific.

The "developing an argument" as persuading the reader and using logic to reach a conclusion. However, interpretations will vary depending on discipline.

3. With respect to the social conventions implicit to argumentation - bilaterality, self- risk, fairness, and rationlity - apply these to yourself in a self-examination of the way you have attempted argumentation and argumentative writing prior to now.

What do you learn from this self-assessment?​

Self-knowledge is a broad term which implies the awareness of one's feelings, attributes, motivations, and abilities. It is important to note that self-knowledge is not a static type of information to acquire, but rather is as dynamic and constantly changing as you are.

For more related question : https://brainly.in/question/167837

#SPJ5