Question

Learning Task 3: Go back to the argument between Reina and Cecilia in I Phase
on page 25. Compare and contrast the claims or the two friends using logos,
ethos, and pathos. Write your answers in your notebook using the table below
Reina
Ceoilla
Logos
Ethos
Pathos​

Answer 1

Answer:

pathos is the correct answer.

Explanation:

i hope it helps you.

Answer 2

Here is a comparison of the claims made by Reina and Cecilia in the argument using logos, ethos, and pathos:

Reina:

| Logos | Reina's claim that the time it takes to complete a task is important is based on logic and reasoning.

| Ethos | Reina's credibility is established by the fact that she is a responsible and efficient person who takes her work seriously.

| Pathos | Reina's appeal to emotion is limited in this argument, as she does not rely heavily on emotional appeals to make her point. However, she does suggest that they will feel better once the task is completed, which could be seen as a subtle emotional appeal.

Cecilia:

| Logos | Cecilia's claim that the quality of the work is important is also based on logic and reasoning. She also supports her claim by pointing out that they have a responsibility to do the best job possible.

| Ethos | Cecilia's credibility is established by the fact that she has a reputation for doing high-quality work and taking pride in her work. This lends credibility to her argument that quality is important.

| Pathos | Cecilia's appeal to emotion is more pronounced than Reina's, as she emphasizes the importance of taking pride in their work and doing a good job.

In summary, Reina and Cecilia both make logical and reasonable arguments, but they approach the situation from different perspectives. Reina emphasizes the importance of efficiency and time management, while Cecilia emphasizes the importance of quality and reputation. Both friends also use ethos to establish their credibility, but Cecilia relies more heavily on pathos to make an emotional appeal.

#SPJ3