Leon verified that the side lengths 21, 28, 35 form a Pythagorean triple using this procedure. Step 1: Find the greatest common factor of the given lengths: 7 Step 2: Divide the given lengths by the greatest common factor: 3, 4, 5 Step 3: Verify that the lengths found in step 2 form a Pythagorean triple: mc011-1.jpg Leon states that 21, 28, 35 is a Pythagorean triple because the lengths found in step 2 form a Pythagorean triple. Which explains whether or not Leon is correct?
Answers
Answered by
45
The procedure used by Leon can not be used to determine whether three figures are Pythagorean triple. This is because it doesn't work in some cases.
It may work in some case like
6, 8 ,10
Where if we divide by the GCF (2), we get 3, 4, 5
But in a case like 9, 40, 41, it can't work, though those figures are Pythagorean triple
In conclusion, Leon's method can not be relied on..
It may work in some case like
6, 8 ,10
Where if we divide by the GCF (2), we get 3, 4, 5
But in a case like 9, 40, 41, it can't work, though those figures are Pythagorean triple
In conclusion, Leon's method can not be relied on..
Answered by
19
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The procedure used by Leon can not be used to determine whether three figures are Pythagorean triple. This is because it doesn't work in some cases.
It may work in some case like
6, 8 ,10
Where if we divide by the GCF (2), we get 3, 4, 5
But in a case like 9, 40, 41, it can't work, though those figures are Pythagorean triple
In conclusion, Leon's method can not be relied on..
Similar questions
Social Sciences,
8 months ago
History,
8 months ago
Math,
8 months ago
Math,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago