Living things move from place to place.. but tree's can't move so it comes under non-living.....is this a right statement?
Answers
Answered by
251
no
we can't distinguish between living and non-living only on the basis of locomotion
we have to include other parameters also like
reproduction
metabolism
response
awareness
Answered by
0
Answer:
No , It is a wrong statement
Explanation:
Though It is true that most living things can move from place to place we cannot define a thing as living or not living on that basis. The characteristics of living things are response to the environment, growth and development, energy processing etc..And these are also exhibited by trees..
So, trees are living things..
Hope this helps you..
Similar questions