Long answer type question.
1. Why is the Munro System considered better than the Permanent System of land revenue?
It's a question of 5 mark and so it should be little lengthy.
Answers
Answered by
1
「ᴜɴʟɪᴋᴇ ᴘᴇʀᴍᴀɴᴇɴᴛ sʏsᴛᴇᴍ, ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ᴡᴀs sᴇᴛ ᴀᴛ ᴀ ғɪxᴇᴅ ʀᴀᴛᴇ ᴏғ ᴛᴀxᴀᴛɪᴏɴ, ᴍᴜɴʀᴏ sʏsᴛᴇᴍ ᴡᴀs sᴇᴛ sᴜᴄʜ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴀʀᴍᴇʀs ʜᴀᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴘᴀʏ ʜᴀʟғ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʀᴏᴘ ᴄᴜʟᴛɪᴠᴀᴛᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴡᴀs ᴘᴀɪᴅ ᴀs ʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴜᴇ. ᴛʜᴇ ʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴜᴇ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ᴀʟsᴏ ɴᴏᴛ ʙᴇ ᴄʜᴀɴɢᴇᴅ ғᴏʀ ᴀ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ᴘᴇʀɪᴏᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪʀᴛʏ ʏᴇᴀʀs.」♡
⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
Hope its help uhh :)
Answered by
0
Explanation:
Unlike permanent system, which was set at a fixed rate of taxation, Munro system was set such that the farmers had to pay half of the value of the crop cultivated by them that was paid as revenue. The revenue would also not be changed for a time period of thirty years.Mar 10, 2019
please mark me as BRAINLIEST
Similar questions